how we work
How we run research projects (publication mindset, reproducibility, mentoring).
We run student projects and theses like real research projects. The default goal is a joint research publication where quality and novelty are important.
What you can expect
- clear scope and milestones (with concrete next steps)
- regular feedback and iteration (paper-style writing early)
- emphasis on reproducibility (clean code, documented runs, reasonable baselines)
- visibility for strong work (talks/demos/public announcements where suitable)
What we expect
- reading papers and translating ideas into experiments
- strong engineering hygiene (clean repos, reproducible runs)
- rigorous evaluation (baselines, ablations/error analysis where meaningful)
- proactive communication (raise issues early; keep timelines realistic)
- a short exposé (motivation with research questions, related work, planned approach, planned evaluation, schedule) before the registration
Authorship and credits
Authorship follows standard academic practice, i.e., students co-author the paper. We clarify roles early in the project.
For thesis topics and how to apply: /student_thesis/
For course/project formats: /teaching/
For positions: /vacancies/